Forward from: isolé à l'âme
Abort the sadistic deities by surrendering completely to their brutality. The executioner's competition with self-flagellation is the pinnacle of what the human mind has reached in terms of mitigating the evil of the gods, not their rule, for their judgment is final.
The Greek tragedy showed the confrontation between the oppressed man and the unjust sky. It did not invent the “solution by bidding for the choice of torment.” In this sense, Christ appears to me as a response to Greek tragedy rather than to Judaism.
Love transgresses, the summary of his evangelization. In the second place. He wanted to feed God first. Is it not that we are most interested in what we do not know? Love, the opposite sex, power, life...
We are not disappointed except in terms of what we wanted to know. The gods did not prevent us from reaching out to the tree of knowledge. Heaven did not punish us when we extended.
Our good instincts prevented us and our destructive instincts prevailed. And what we were punished was a self-punishment: the void that we tried to fill with more existence, expanded, spread, and increased, suffocating our blood.
The sin is not that we are drawn to the unknown, on the contrary: This is a blessed call.
The sin is that we break the magic of attraction with the will to understand, with the will to program spontaneity and normalize the dream. That is the downfall of all refugee conscious.
As in holiness, so in sin: apathy is hateful. It should not, it is not enough to ask questions, even if you call them the crucial questions.
Asking the question, to be sufficient or sufficient a little or more, must be the size of the understanding or higher. If God asks a question, answer. If I ask a question to God, it remains a question, no matter how hard God or your heart may squeeze.
I also answer, to get the answers. To hear the answers, answers dig into the wall. Many usually say: This man's wood is that he asked questions that stirred the conscience of his time.
To pose the question alone, the answer, even if it is crazy and maddened, is better than remaining in the position of a helpless victim standing at the borders of a question that does not have the strength to elicit the answer. Not enough.
#Essays
The Greek tragedy showed the confrontation between the oppressed man and the unjust sky. It did not invent the “solution by bidding for the choice of torment.” In this sense, Christ appears to me as a response to Greek tragedy rather than to Judaism.
Love transgresses, the summary of his evangelization. In the second place. He wanted to feed God first. Is it not that we are most interested in what we do not know? Love, the opposite sex, power, life...
We are not disappointed except in terms of what we wanted to know. The gods did not prevent us from reaching out to the tree of knowledge. Heaven did not punish us when we extended.
Our good instincts prevented us and our destructive instincts prevailed. And what we were punished was a self-punishment: the void that we tried to fill with more existence, expanded, spread, and increased, suffocating our blood.
The sin is not that we are drawn to the unknown, on the contrary: This is a blessed call.
The sin is that we break the magic of attraction with the will to understand, with the will to program spontaneity and normalize the dream. That is the downfall of all refugee conscious.
As in holiness, so in sin: apathy is hateful. It should not, it is not enough to ask questions, even if you call them the crucial questions.
Asking the question, to be sufficient or sufficient a little or more, must be the size of the understanding or higher. If God asks a question, answer. If I ask a question to God, it remains a question, no matter how hard God or your heart may squeeze.
I also answer, to get the answers. To hear the answers, answers dig into the wall. Many usually say: This man's wood is that he asked questions that stirred the conscience of his time.
To pose the question alone, the answer, even if it is crazy and maddened, is better than remaining in the position of a helpless victim standing at the borders of a question that does not have the strength to elicit the answer. Not enough.
#Essays