Репост из: አዲስ ምልከታ🌍
The fact that the globe-universe-heliocentric model is based on unproven claims and explanations, meant that over time there was more and more evidence against it, and the so called scientists continued more and more "plausible" contrived explanations for them. This meant that they created lies upon lies, and that led to a point in the history of science, where only few, bright-minded people could understand it. When in reality, it should have been the opposite, anyone should be able to understand, and challenge these theories. But now they have gotten so complicated and non-common-sensical that it is simply impossible for the average person to engage with them.
Here is one example
- simple lies like newton's gravity, led to the problem of "singularity"
- this meant that the universe should come collapsing together
- but also the observations indicated that it was not the case
- so they created new concepts like dark matter and dark energy, this invisible, un-detectable mysterious thing that keeps the world from collapsing together. But there is no way to prove that it even exists
Another example
- there was a claim that earth moves through space
- but Michelson-morley experiment proved that that is wrong
- So they created new theories "length contraction", "time dilation" etc to explain away why Michelson-Morley experiment was wrong
- Not only is this non-sensical, there was no evidence for it and it was even disproven by the Sagnac Experiment
- On the other hand, Albert Einstein and others claimed that the aether, a form of matter believed to exist above earth, did not exist at all
- This created a big problem. If light is a wave, and it travels through space, then what is the medium
- And here, they created one more false theory: the "wave-particle duality". Now light is both a wave and a stream of particle, so it can move through empty space
- But now which one is it really? Wave or particle? Well it's both, kind of
- well then if it's a wave, how is it's speed constant?
There is just no answer to this. Just more and more nonsense answers that we have to just accept, because brilliant minded scientists told us.
But this is exactly what they were criticizing in religion -- that we were following the words of religious leaders, and trusting their word.
So how is this not hypocrisy?
Here is one example
- simple lies like newton's gravity, led to the problem of "singularity"
- this meant that the universe should come collapsing together
- but also the observations indicated that it was not the case
- so they created new concepts like dark matter and dark energy, this invisible, un-detectable mysterious thing that keeps the world from collapsing together. But there is no way to prove that it even exists
Another example
- there was a claim that earth moves through space
- but Michelson-morley experiment proved that that is wrong
- So they created new theories "length contraction", "time dilation" etc to explain away why Michelson-Morley experiment was wrong
- Not only is this non-sensical, there was no evidence for it and it was even disproven by the Sagnac Experiment
- On the other hand, Albert Einstein and others claimed that the aether, a form of matter believed to exist above earth, did not exist at all
- This created a big problem. If light is a wave, and it travels through space, then what is the medium
- And here, they created one more false theory: the "wave-particle duality". Now light is both a wave and a stream of particle, so it can move through empty space
- But now which one is it really? Wave or particle? Well it's both, kind of
- well then if it's a wave, how is it's speed constant?
There is just no answer to this. Just more and more nonsense answers that we have to just accept, because brilliant minded scientists told us.
But this is exactly what they were criticizing in religion -- that we were following the words of religious leaders, and trusting their word.
So how is this not hypocrisy?